Medical De-Credentialing Board

Adverse Actions Taken Against Military Medical Provider Credentials – Abeyance, Suspension, Revocation, QAI, Peer Review Hearings

While general court-martial (and sometimes special court-martial) successes may result in more public recognition, there are many other military adverse actions that could have a dramatically negatively impact on a military member’s career and future. Our civilian defense attorneys handle these adverse military actions. Such cases include adverse actions taken against a military medical provider’s credentials, such as abeyance, suspension, revocation, QAI, and Peer Review (de-credentialing) hearings.

A military adverse credentialing action is an action taken against a military medical provider’s authorization to practice medicine (credentials/privileges). These adverse actions are addressed by service specific regulations, as well as DHA-PM 6025.13. The adverse action process could proceed from abeyance or suspension of medical credentials (privileges), through negative recommendations by the QAI investigation, negative recommendations by the Credentials Committee or Credentials Function, a peer review (de-credentialing) board hearing, and negative action by the privileging authority. Adverse credentialing actions could be reported to the National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB), and could have state medical licensing ramifications.

Adverse military credentials actions can be initiated based on allegations of misconduct, incompetence, or medical care that violates the applicable standard of care. Such actions could have a significant impact on the military medical provider’s license and career (promotion and assignments) – and could even lead to administrative discharge/separation, particularly in this time of military drawdowns. Negative results in these actions follow a military medical provider into medical practice in the civilian community as well. Because of this, having an experienced and aggressive defense attorney on your side is absolutely vital in these military cases.

Attorney Richard V. Stevens represents military members/doctors/medical providers facing QAI, medical de-credentialing, suspensions, and/or abeyances. Mr. Stevens is a civilian criminal defense attorney, former active duty military JAG lawyer, and former medical malpractice defense lawyer who exclusively practices military law and defends military members stationed around the world who are facing military trials, disciplinary actions, appeals, adverse actions, board hearings, and investigations.

If you’re facing a military adverse action against your medical license/practice/credentials/privileges, don’t hesitate to seek the legal help you’re going to need. For a free initial case consultation, please contact us.

Attorney Richard Stevens

Mr. Stevens has been handling military cases since 1995. He has defended military cases dealing with the most serious military offenses, including allegations of “war crimes,” national security cases, murder, manslaughter, homicide, rape, sexual assault, other sex related offenses, drug offenses, computer crimes (pornography), larceny, fraud, AWOL/desertion, conduct unbecoming, military academy offenses, offenses within combat zones, senior officer cases and other military specific offenses around the world. [ Attorney Bio ]

Table of Contentsimage of star

Get Help Nowimage of star

Complete the below form for a free, no obligation initial consultation.


    “Your client has no idea how lucky he was to have hired you.”

    - Former Senior Military JAG Attorney

    “He simply commanded the courtroom, prepared to the teeth, and, most importantly, retained his personal and professional manner that proved so impressive in his advocacy success.”

    - Former Senior Military Judge

    “His advocacy, compassion, intellect, and demeanor are unsurpassed.”

    - Former Military Staff Judge Advocate and Trial Judge

    “That was the best closing argument I have ever seen; by a civilian or military attorney.”

    - Senior Court Reporter

    From Our Blogimage of star

    Military Noncommissioned Officer Has Sexual Assault Case Dropped (UCMJ Article 120)

    Recently, a military noncommissioned officer defended by attorney Richard V. Stevens (Military Defense Law Offices of Richard V. Stevens, P.C.) had the alleged sexual assault case he faced dropped by the military before court-martial charges were preferred against him (UCMJ A [...]