MILITARY OFFICER REPRESENTED BY MILITARY LEGAL DEFENSE ATTORNEY RICHARD V. STEVENS RETAINED IN MILITARY AFTER FACING INVOLUNTARY ADMINISTRATIVE DISCHARGE CASE

Military Defense Lawyer (Former JAG Attorney) News: Military Officer Retained

Recently, a military officer defended by attorney Richard V. Stevens (Military Defense Law Offices of Richard V. Stevens, P.C.) was retained in the service after facing involuntary administrative discharge action.

In the military justice system, a military member can face involuntary administrative discharge action (“getting kicked out”) for a variety of reasons. These reasons can include alleged misconduct. If the military member is not authorized to have their case heard in an administrative discharge board hearing (“Show Cause” board, “Board of Inquiry” [BOI], “Officer Elimination” board), then the case is decided based on the member’s written rebuttal package.

In this case, the military officer had previously received a disciplinary action for alleged misconduct, but was a junior officer who was not authorized an administrative discharge board hearing. Attorney Richard V. Stevens was hired to represent the officer client in preparing the written rebuttal package in response to the involuntary administrative discharge notice.

A written rebuttal package for an administrative discharge case can include the member’s response statement and argument for retention, letters of support, awards and decorations, performance reports, other accomplishments and recognitions, and military career documents. The disadvantage of not being entitled to a board hearing is that the board deciding the case does not hear from the member personally, or hear from witnesses, or hear the attorney arguments. Instead, they consider a written package, so it must be particularly compelling to achieve retention.

In this case, we submitted a compelling package that included obtaining and submitting important letters of support, witness statements, evidence, the respondent’s memo, and the attorney’s legal memo/brief. In the submission in this case, we attacked all facets of the discharge action. We attacked the procedural errors. We attacked the government’s flawed interpretation of military law and applicable regulations, and we convincingly attacked the government’s misguided claim that the client had committed misconduct. Ultimately, after the discharge board reviewed the rebuttal package, the officer client was retained in the military and will continue serving. Because this was an administrative case, more details cannot be provided to protect the client’s privacy.

While this involuntary administrative discharge case was successfully defended, and the client was retained in the military, it is important to understand that every case has different facts, and success in previous cases does not guarantee success in any particular future case. No military lawyer or civilian defense lawyer, including those who specialize in military law, can guarantee the outcome of any military trial or case. For more information about the military justice system, particularly cases involving administrative discharge actions, see: Military Administrative Discharges and Separations

We offer free consultations for a case you may be involved in. Just call us.

An experienced and aggressive defense attorney is absolutely vital in these military cases.

Civilian court-martial defense attorney Richard V. Stevens is a civilian criminal defense attorney and former active duty military JAG lawyer who exclusively practices military law and defends military members stationed around the world who are facing military trials, discipline and investigations. If you’re facing a military case like this, don’t hesitate to seek the legal help you’re going to need. For a free initial case consultation, please contact us.

No attorney can guarantee the outcome you seek in your military case. What we can promise is that we will apply our decades of experience to the defense of your military case. This includes our extensive experience in military law, military regulations, military investigations, military disciplinary actions, military adverse actions, and/or military court-martial trials and cases.

Client Testimonials and Reviews

Please see Client Testimonials and Client Reviews for Attorney Richard V. Stevens.

Law Firm Social Media Accounts

Please find updates on our law firm and our cases on our social media:
Our Blog
Successful Case Defenses Through 2025
Twitter X
Facebook
Instagram

Blog postscript: I (attorney Richard V. Stevens) am a former active duty military lawyer (JAG). My perspectives and advice, therefore, are based upon my experience as a military defense lawyer and as a civilian criminal defense lawyer practicing exclusively in the area of military law and military justice. This blog addresses issues in military law, military justice, military discipline, military defense, court-martial practice, the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) and other military and/or legal topics. Nothing posted in this blog should be substituted for legal advice in any particular case. If you seek legal advice for a particular case, please contact The Law Offices of Richard V. Stevens for a free consultation. These military defense law offices are located in the Washington DC, Northern Virginia, Maryland, National Capital Region (NCR), but the military defense representation is worldwide – when necessary, the attorneys travel to wherever the military client is stationed around the world.